Verified before visible
Brands are scored on evidence before they're ranked or syndicated; investors are verified before any introduction.
The franchise internet runs on selling the same form-fill to whoever pays. We think that model fails brands, wastes investors and embarrasses the industry. Here is the math — and what we do instead.
US franchise-development data (2026 Annual Franchise Development Report, Franchise Update Media) puts the numbers in plain sight:
A form-fill, resold and unverified — 98 of 100 go nowhere.
Capital, timeline and motivation verified — 6× the raw rate.
A structured, prepared meeting — where deals actually happen.
Meanwhile the average cost of a single franchise lead hit $351 in 2025 (3.6× in four years) — and the FTC ordered one home-services portal to pay up to $7.2M for misrepresenting lead quality. Selling the 2% product at rising prices is not a business we want. (AFDR 2026 ↗ · FTC ↗)
Brands are scored on evidence before they're ranked or syndicated; investors are verified before any introduction.
One candidate, one brand, one structured meeting. Your enquiry is never resold or shared with 'similar opportunities'.
No GO GLOBAL 100 position, Passport tier or Rights Board slot can be bought. Scores are earned or they mean nothing.
Every statistic we publish carries its source. If we can't anchor a number, we don't print it.
Our main fees sit on signed agreements — a fraction of broker rates — so we only win when brands and investors do.
Vietnamese brands are stepping onto the world stage for the first time. If their first experience of international franchising is resold leads and pay-to-play rankings, the whole wave stalls. Trust infrastructure isn't a feature for this market — it is the product.
That is what the readiness standards, the verified Passports, the NDA-protected Rights Board and this manifesto add up to: a market where the 75% meetings happen, not the 2% ones.
Read the standards we publish and score us against them — starting with the index and the quarterly report.